Première étape dans le développement et standardisation des reproductions asexuées et dans l’élevage de quatre espèces de coraux Acropora sp, Montipora sp, Lobophillia sp et Acanthastrea sp en conditions de laboratoire à Longueuil. Indice de sante aquanov et test premier test de l'indice de sante aquanov et la détermination du meilleur système d'éclairage pour deux espèces de coraux.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Development of the health index of AQUANOV corals and the first testing of the Index during the determination of the best lighting system for two coral species.With the purpose of developing a methodology to evaluate the health status of corals, the biological visual indicators of corals that may be rapidly evaluated were determined, which could indicate the corals' physiological status. The indicators chosen were: 1. Polyps' expansion; 2. Placement of the coral; 3. Growth band.Each indicator was conferred a value from 1 to 3. The corals' health status was determined by the addition of these three indicators at a determined time. We named this index the "Aquanov Index" (IA). The reference values obtained for health were: from 1-3 poor health, 4-5 regular health, 6-7 regular good, 8-9 good health.In a second stage of this study, 18 mini colonies of 2 species, Acropora sp and Montipora sp, were submitted to three different light sources during 30 days, with the purpose of evaluating their answer. The Aquanov Index (IA) was used as an evaluation tool. The assessed lights were metal halide, neon lights and LED lights. The best results were obtained with metal halide lights, with which the corals obtained an average IA of 8.3 with a standard deviation of+/- 1.2 for Acropora sp and an average value of 8.3 (+/- 0.6) for Montipora sp. The second best results were obtained with neon lights, with which Acropora sp obtained an average IA value of 7.7 (+/- 0.6), and Montipora sp, 7.3 (+/- 0.6). In both cases, the mortality was 0%.On the contrary, LED lights in this initial sage generated high mortalities, 66% for Acropora sp and 33% for Montipora sp, from the day 15. Therefore, it was decided to cancel the study with these lights.The Aquanov Index was a very helpful tool to evaluate the corals' health status.Further studies with LED lights are required, given that the obtained results were unexpected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".