Dark Monuments: the Protest Narratives of Krzysztof Wodiczko, Janet Cardiff, and Michael Candy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper will examine how two artists, Krzysztof Wodiczko (Polish/Canadian), and Michael Candy (South African/Australian) working exactly thirty years apart (1986 and 2016) used the current technologies of the day to activate and politicise public monuments in Venice and Paris. It will show how technological developments - SatNav, web-streaming, and jet travel (all of which display dark auras under certain readings) enable Candy to expand the possibilities opened up by early pioneers such as Wodiczko (and to an extent fellow Canadian Janet Cardiff who will also be referenced). Wodiczko’s use of triple 35mm slide projectors to cast a skin of light over some of Venice’s major monuments (referencing both terrorism and tourism) find a dark soul mate in Candy’s Digital Empathy Device which he attached to the Goddess of Liberty Statue at the site of the Bataclan memorial in 2016, at the Place de la Republique, in Paris. A bomb explodes in Syria and the statue starts to weep. This paper will be constructed through interviews, made by the presenter, with Candy, Cardiff, and Wodiczko, between 1986 and 2019. It will argue that New Ideas will find New Hosts, as technologies and communications systems evolve. In the work of all three artists (Candy, Cardiff, and Wodiczko) elements of city planning to enable military marching between monuments; psychogeography; and "adventurism" are present. The work of all three artists is also situated between David Hume's Enlightenment philosophies and the counter-response to these as seen in the 2016 Edinburgh Art Festival exhibition The Scottish Endarkenment (curators Bill Hare and Professor Andrew Patrizio).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it