An approximate maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of sequenced streptomycetes (PDF)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is the full scale phylogenetic tree described in the following manuscript submitted to Chemical Science:<br>Formicamycins, antibacterial polyketides produced by <i>Streptomyces formicae </i>isolated from African <i>Tetraponera</i> plant-ants<br>Zhiwei Qin<sup>1</sup>, John T Munnoch<sup>2</sup>, Rebecca Devine<sup>2</sup>, Neil A Holmes<sup>2</sup>, Ryan F Seipke<sup>3</sup>, Barrie Wilkinson<sup>1</sup>* and Matthew I Hutchings<sup>2</sup>*<br><sup>1</sup>Department of Molecular Microbiology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.<br><sup>2</sup>School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom. <br><sup>3</sup>School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.<br>*Contact: m.hutchings@uea.ac.uk or @matthutchings10 and barrie.wilkinson@jic.ac.uk <br>Legend: An approximate maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of sequenced streptomycetes. A phylogeny was inferred for <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> and 573 sequenced streptomycetes based on concatenated partial sequences for <i>atpD-rpoB</i>. FastTree local support values are indicated at each node. The scale bar shown indicates 6% estimated sequence divergence. The phylogenetic tree can also be downloaded in Nerwick format from FigShare at: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3507536.v1. <br><br>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.482 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".