MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6958796171 · doi:10.7298/x40c4t2d

Relationship between Bikeshare and Transit: Evidence from the BIXI system in Montreal

2018· article· en· W6958796171 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeCommons (Cornell University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationMeasure (data warehouse)Work (physics)Stability (learning theory)Variable (mathematics)Limiting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to identify the relationship between bikesharing ridership and transit-related variables in Montreal, Canada. Preliminary analysis of BIXI trip logs in 2016 shows there are similarities between the spatial distribution patterns of BIXI ridership and metro ridership, and temporal patterns of bikesharing trips indicate that some annual members are using BIXI as one of their daily commuting modes. The OLS model and the spatial lag model are used to investigate the relationship between bikesharing ridership and independent variables in transit service levels, connectivity and transport-related demographics. The 5-minute walk time buffer is chosen as the measure for the dependent variable and 12 independent variables. The log-log transformed OLS model has a 75% goodness of fit and identifies a number of variables significantly associated with BIXI ridership. In the stepwise regression model, significant variables are metro ridership, street network connectivity, daytime population, number of people that travel to work by walking, number of people that travel to work by bicycle, population aged 20 to 24 (negative), and average household expenditure on private transportation (negative). For 10% increase in metro ridership, a 4.16% increase in BIXI ridership is expected. The highly significant Moran's I indicates strong spatial autocorrelation. LM and robust LM tests justify our choice of the spatial lag model. This study uses both GeoDa and Stata to run the spatial lag model, in order to test the model with different spatial weighting matrices. Results show that the structure of the inverse distance matrix in Stata is more suitable for representing spatial interactions in bikesharing trips between metro buffers. Metro ridership is highly significant and is the second strongest predictor. After removing spatial effects, 10 percent increase in metro ridership is associated with 5.44 percent increase in BIXI ridership. In both the OLS model and the spatial lag model, metro ridership, street network connectivity, number of people that travel to work by walking and number of people that travel to work by bicycle are positively associated with BIXI ridership. This result indicates that transit riders and active travelers are potential users of bikesharing services. Through collaborative and intermodal planning, the relationship between bikeshare and transit could be strengthened and bikeshare could fulfill its potential to be a powerful complement to public transit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it