MOESM1 of Relationship between ITPA polymorphisms and hemolytic anemia in HCV-infected patients after ribavirin-based therapy: a meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1: Table S1. Methodological quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis, which was assessed using a modified score based in the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603–605). (see Supplemental Box 2). Table S2. Meta-regression analysis for hemoglobin decline (A–C), severe anemia (D) and ribavirin dose reduction or discontinuation (E) according to ITPA polymorphisms. Box 1. Description of rs1127354/rs7270101 haplotype: ITPase deficiency ranged from absent (-) (representing wild-type activity) to mild (+), moderate (++) or severe (+++) (8, 10). Box 2. Methodological criteria used to evaluate the quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis. This score was adapted from Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603–605). Figure S1. Publication bias for the rs1127354 studies included in the meta-analysis for hemoglobin decline(A), severe anemia (B) and ribavirin dose reduction or discontinuation (C) according both to Begg’s funnel plots and Egger’s test. Abbreviations: Coef., asymmetry regression coefficient; Std.Err., standard error; t, statistic; P>|t|, significance; and CI, confidence interval. Coefficients correspond to the intercept value in the regression equation, which estimates the asymmetry of the funnel plot. Positive values (Coef.> 0) indicate higher levels of effect size in studies with smaller sample sizes. Figure S2. Publication heterogeneity for studies included in the meta-analysis for hemoglobin decline: rs1127354 (A), rs7270101 (B), rs6051702 (C); severe anemia: haplotype rs1127354CC / rs7270101AA (D); and ribavirin dose reduction or discontinuation: rs1127354 (E); according to Galbraith’s plots. Abbreviations 1/s.e, precision; b/s.e, standardized effect. Figure S3. Sensitivity analysis for studies included in the meta-analysis for hemoglobin decline: rs1127354 (A), rs7270101 (B), rs6051702 (C), haplotype absent (-) vs. mild (+)/moderate (++)/severe (+++) (D), haplotype mild (+) vs. moderate (++)/severe (+++) (E) and moderate (++) vs. severe (+++) (F). Sensitivity analyses were carried out to investigate the influence of any one study on the overall meta-analysis by sequential omission of individual studies. Figure S4. Forest plot of the meta-analysis performed to investigate the association between ITPA rs6051702 polymorphisms and hemoglobin decline, included in the Hwang, et al. Article (32). Abbreviations: CI, confidence intervals; OR, odds ratio. Figure S5. Sensitivity analysis for studies included in the meta-analysis for severe anemia: rs1127354 (A), haplotype absent (-) vs. mild (+)/moderate (++)/severe (+++) (B) and haplotype mild (+) vs. moderate (++)/severe (+++) (C). Sensitivity analyses were carried out to investigate the influence of any one study on the overall meta-analysis by sequential omission of individual studies. Figure S6. Sensitivity analysis for studies included in the meta-analysis for ribavirin dose reduction or discontinuation: rs1127354 (A), haplotype absent (-) vs. mild (+)/moderate (++)/severe (+++) (B), haplotype mild (+) vs. moderate (++)/severe (+++) (C) and moderate (++) vs. severe (+++) (D). Sensitivity analyses were carried out to investigate the influence of any one study on the overall meta-analysis by sequential omission of individual studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.057 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.039 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.109 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".