MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6958964035 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7500951

The decriminalization of illicit drugs in British Columbia: a national evaluation protocol

2024· other· en· W6958964035 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEgo Development and Educational Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSimon Fraser UniversityCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecriminalizationProtocol (science)StakeholderIllicit drugCriminal justiceEconomic Justice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.213
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.107
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2130.107
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0120.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicEgo Development and Educational Practices→French-language works237,207→