Activation of Toll-Like Receptor-Mediated Antiviral Response Against Infectious Laryngotracheitis Virus Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) is a highly prevalent avian respiratory virus in Canada and globally, which can cause mild to severe respiratory illnesses. Although the live attenuated ILTV vaccines are commonly used for control, they pose challenges such as establishing lifelong latent infections, reactivating and shedding latent viruses, and regaining virulence in vaccine strains. Therefore, it is essential to develop novel control measures to address the limitations of current approaches. Inducing innate antiviral responses via the activation of toll-like receptors (TLRs) is a promising strategy for reducing ILTV replication. Endosomal TLRs in chickens, such as TLR7 and TLR21, recognize viral genetic materials, while surface TLRs (e.g., TLR4) primarily recognize bacterial molecules, but may also contribute to antiviral responses by recognizing viral proteins. Synthetic TLR ligands have been shown to induce antiviral responses against some avian viruses, such as avian influenza virus (AIV), infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV), ILTV, and infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). However, the impacts of in-ovo delivery of endosomal TLR7 and TLR21 ligands and surface TLR4 ligand (single-stranded (ss) RNA, cytosine-guanosine deoxynucleotides (CpG) DNA, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), respectively) in reducing ILTV replication in chickens post-hatch through induction of antiviral responses is unknown. This thesis aimed to study the enhanced immune response following in-ovo treatment of these TLR ligands against ILTV infection in young chickens. Our hypothesis is that in-ovo delivery of these ligands will enhance antiviral immune responses and reduce ILTV replication in chickens post-hatch. Our results confirmed the following findings: Firstly, the in-ovo administration of synthetic TLR7 ligand, resiquimod, reduces ILTV shedding post-hatch, correlating with enhanced macrophage responses. Secondly, the in-ovo delivered CpG DNA stimulates cellular immune responses in multiple organs post-hatch, potentially reducing ILTV infection. Thirdly, the in-ovo LPS treatment stimulates protective antiviral responses against ILTV infection post-hatch, correlating with the expansion of macrophage population in the lungs. Overall, the studies provide insights into the mechanisms of host responses elicited following in-ovo delivery of these three TLR ligands against ILTV in chickens. The outcomes of the current studies can be helpful in fine-tuning the currently used vaccine strategies against ILTV in chicken to achieve maximum protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".