MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6959429335 · doi:10.7939/r3-7syy-jd18

ON THE CIRCULATION AND FRESHWATER DYNAMICS OF THE HUDSON BAY COMPLEX

2020· dissertation· en· W6959429335 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayDischargeCirculation (fluid dynamics)Ocean currentWater massWater circulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Hudson Bay Complex (HBC), which includes Hudson, James, and Ungava Bays, Foxe Basin, and Hudson Strait, is currently undergoing change from two anthropogenic sources; industry and global warming. The communities surrounding this region use the sea for travel, hunting, and social connections, year round. Changes in the food chain and ice conditions thus impact the daily lives of the locals. The HBC also has a large drainage basin, receiving about 900 km^3 of freshwater annually, making it an ideal location for the production of hydroelectricity. This riverine water traverses Hudson Bay and is advected to the North Atlantic via Hudson Strait, the main pathway for exchange between the HBC and the global ocean. Hudson Strait is also the third largest source of advected freshwater to the Labrador Sea after Fram and Davis Straits. However, our understanding of the role of riverine water in the bay is limited, and downstream effects of changes in river discharge is presently unknown. Additionally, knowledge of circulation in areas, such as Hudson Strait, is limited to a few observational datasets. These datasets focus mostly on the southern side of the strait which contains fresh eastward flow, and while valuable, there are no recent published data for the north side of the strait containing westward flowing waters entering the bay. I begin by presenting the first multi-year freshwater budget for the HBC. Using four model simulations and three river discharge datasets, I show that river discharge impacts freshwater fluxes out of the region on timescales longer than a year. Decreased river discharge and seasonality led to reduced freshwater and volume exchange within the HBC and to the North Atlantic. Model resolution had minimal impact on freshwater and volume fluxes in areas with simple flow dynamics. I also provide estimates of the Ekman, mean, and turbulent components of freshwater exchange between the interior and boundary regions of the bay. The mean and Ekman components import freshwater to the interior in spring and summer, and export it in the fall. Residence times of discharge in the HBC are calculated using an offline Lagrangian passive tracer tool, with an upper limit of 32 years. Using the highest resolution model simulation available at the time, I revisited the summer circulation pattern in Hudson Bay, which historically was thought to be cyclonic. Using satellite altimetry data along with model output, I showed that in summer, steric height gradients due to increased river discharge in summer, generate small scale features, including anticyclonic geostrophic flow in eastern Hudson Bay. Given this result, I present a revised summer surface flow pattern for Hudson Bay. Finally, to increase our understanding of flow and water exchange in Hudson Strait, I present the first year long observed measurements of flow on the northern side of Hudson Strait. Mooring data show a saline, weakly stratified inflow with reduced seasonality on the northern side compared to the southern side of the strait, which contains the fresh, discharge laden outflow. Source waters are from the Baffin Island Current, comprised mainly of Arctic water, with small contributions from Transitional Water and West Greenland Irminger Water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta Library→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→