MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6959457648 · doi:10.1021/ja807701y.s001

From Phenylsiloxane Polymer Composition to Size-Controlled Silicon Carbide Nanocrystals

2016· article· en· W6959457648 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced ceramic materials synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrichlorosilanePolymerSilicon carbideEtching (microfabrication)NanocrystalSiliconSilicon tetrachloride

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon carbide (SiC) has become a very important material for many high-performance applications as a result of its exceptional material properties. The emergence of size-dependent properties in SiC nanocrystals (SiC-NCs), together with the increased surface area intrinsic to nanocrystals, has led to a variety of new possible applications, including optoelectronics and hybrid materials. Here we report the straightforward preparation of size-controlled oxide-embedded and freestanding SiC-NCs from the reductive thermal processing of compositionally controlled phenylsiloxane polymers. Compositional tuning of the polymers is achieved by varying the relative amounts of phenyl trichlorosilane (C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>SiCl<sub>3</sub>) and silicon tetrachloride (SiCl<sub>4</sub>) during hydrolysis and cocondensation. Thermal processing of the resulting compositionally controlled condensation copolymers yields oxide-embedded SiC-NCs whose average diameter is dependent on the relative C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>SiCl<sub>3</sub> concentration in the initial precursor mixture. A liberation procedure for preparing size-controlled freestanding SiC-NCs that involves oxidation of matrix carbon and subsequent chemical etching of the matrix is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5400.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicAdvanced ceramic materials synthesisFrench-language works237,207