Injectable Interpenetrating Network Hydrogels via\nKinetically Orthogonal Reactive Mixing of Functionalized Polymeric\nPrecursors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The enhanced mechanics, unique chemistries,\nand potential for domain\nformation in interpenetrating network (IPN) hydrogels have attracted\nsignificant interest in the context of biomedical applications. However,\nconventional IPNs are not directly injectable in a biological context,\nlimiting their potential utility in such applications. Herein, we\nreport a fully injectable and thermoresponsive interpenetrating polymer\nnetwork formed by simultaneous reactive mixing of hydrazone cross-linked\npoly(<i>N</i>-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM), and thiosuccinimide\ncross-linked poly(<i>N</i>-vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP). The\nresulting IPN gels rapidly (<1 min) after injection without the\nneed for heat, UV irradiation, or small-molecule cross-linkers. The\nIPNs, cross-linked by kinetically orthogonal mechanisms, showed a\nsignificant synergistic enhancement in shear storage modulus compared\nto the individual component networks as well as distinctive pore morphology,\ndegradation kinetics, and thermal swelling; in particular, significantly\nlower hysteresis was observed over the thermal phase transition relative\nto single-network PNIPAM hydrogels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.145 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".