MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Morphology-density relation, quenching, and mergers in CARLA clusters and protoclusters at 1.4 <

2023· article· en· W6959585749 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEgo Development and Educational Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyJet Propulsion LaboratorySpace Telescope Science InstituteCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsGalaxy clusterCluster (spacecraft)GalaxyRedshiftHaloGalaxy groups and clustersBrightest cluster galaxyGalaxy merger

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At redshifts of z ≲ 1.3, early-type galaxies (ETGs) and passive galaxies are mainly found in dense environments, such as galaxy clusters. However, it remains unclear whether these well-known morphology-density and passive-density relations have already been established at higher redshifts. To address this question, we performed an in-depth study of galaxies in 16 spectroscopically confirmed clusters at 1.3 < z < 2.8 from the Clusters Around Radio-Loud AGN (CARLA) survey. Our clusters span a total stellar mass in the range of $ 11.3 < \log\bigg(\frac{M^c_*}{M_{\odot}}\bigg) < 12.6 $ (approximate halo mass in the range of $ 13.5 \lesssim \log\bigg(\frac{M^c_h}{M_{\odot}}\bigg) \lesssim 14.5 $). Our main finding is that the morphology-density and passive-density relations are already in place at z ∼ 2. The cluster at z = 2.8 shows a similar fraction of ETG as in the other clusters in its densest region, however, only one cluster does not provide enough statistics to confirm that the morphology-density relation is already in place at z ∼ 3. The cluster ETG and passive fractions depend mainly on local environment and only slightly on galaxy mass; also, they do not depend on the global environment. At lower local densities, where ΣN < 700 gal/Mpc2, the CARLA clusters exhibit a similar ETG fraction as the field, in contradiction to clusters at z = 1, which already exhibit higher ETG fractions. This implies that the densest regions influence the morphology of galaxies first, with lower density local environments either taking longer or only influencing galaxy morphology at later cosmological times. Interestingly, we find evidence of high merger fractions in our clusters with respect to the CANDELS fields, but the merger fractions do not significantly depend on local environment. This suggests that merger remnants in the lowest density regions can reform disks fueled by cold gas flows, but those in the highest density regions are cut off from the gas supply and will become passive ETGs. The percentages of active ETGs, with respect to the total ETG population, are 21 ± 6% and 59 ± 14% at 1.35 < z < 1.65 and 1.65 < z < 2.05, respectively, and about half of them are mergers or asymmetric in both redshift bins. All the spectroscopically confirmed CARLA clusters have properties that are consistent with clusters and proto-clusters, confirming that radio-loud active galactic nuclei are lighthouses for dense environments. The differences between our results and other findings that point to enhanced star formation and starbursts in cluster cores at similar redshifts are probably due to differences in the sample selection criteria; for example, selection of different environments hosting galaxies with different accretion and pre-processing histories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it