MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6959668536 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf600

Sub-second optical/near-infrared quasi-periodic oscillations from the black hole X-ray transient Swift J1727.8–1613

2025· article· en· W6959668536 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean CommissionNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAcademy of FinlandLeverhulme TrustH2020 European Research CouncilAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsNoise (video)Fusible alloyLimitingFilter (signal processing)Dimmer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We report on the detection of optical/near-infrared (O-IR) quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) from the black hole (BH) X-ray transient Swift J1727.8–1613. We obtained three X-ray and O-IR high-time-resolution observations of the source during its intermediate state (2023 September 9, 15, and 17) using NICER, HAWK-I@VLT, HIPERCAM@GTC, and ULTRACAM@NTT. We clearly detected a QPO in the X-ray and O-IR bands during all three epochs. The QPO evolved, drifting from 1.4 Hz in the first epoch, up to 2.2 Hz in the second, and finally reaching 4.2 Hz in the third epoch. These are among the highest O-IR QPO frequencies detected for a BH X-ray transient. During the first two epochs, the X-ray and O-IR emission are correlated, with an optical lag (compared to the X-rays) varying from +70 to 0 ms. Finally, during the third epoch, we measured, for the first time, a lag of the $z_s$ band with respect to the $g_s$ band at the QPO frequency ($\approx$ +10 ms). By estimating the variable O-IR SED we find that the emission is most likely non-thermal. Current state-of-the-art models can explain some of these properties, but neither the jet nor the hot flow model can easily explain the observed evolution of the QPOs. While this allowed us to put tight constraints on these components, more frequent coverage of the state transition with fast multiwavelength observations is still needed to fully understand the evolution of the disc/jet properties in BH low-mass X-ray binaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsFrench-language works237,207