Greenhouse gas emissions from pig slurry applied to forage legumes on a loamy sand soil in south central Manitoba
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gao, X., Tenuta, M., Buckley, K. E., Zvomuya, F. and Ominski, K. 2014. Greenhouse gas emissions from pig slurry applied to forage legumes on a loamy sand soil in south central Manitoba. Can. J. Soil Sci. 94: 149-155. Information regarding the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from the application of pig slurry to forage in western Canada is limited. This study examined the effects of addition of pig slurry and soil water content with landscape position on nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions from forage legumes [sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa)] on a sandy loam soil in Brandon, Manitoba, over two growing seasons. Pig slurry was surface applied with a rolling aerator-type tine at a rate of 35000 L ha-1 and 38000 L ha-1, providing 62-15-50 and 205-45-86, actual N-P-K kg ha-1, in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Emissions were measured on and between surface bands of the slurry applied to soil. Soil concentrations of -N and -N, moisture, and temperature were also monitored. In both years, slurry application increased growing season cumulative N2O emissions. Net increase in cumulative N2O-N emissions with slurry treatment ranged from 0.04 to 0.05% of total N ha-1 applied in 2006 but from 0.7 to 0.9% in 2007. The coherence of rapidly increasing N2O emissions following slurry application with decreasing soil and increasing concentration, in combination with the fact that emissions continued even when soil concentrations were undetectable, suggest nitrification and denitrification were sources of N2O. Emissions of CH4 were generally slightly negative and unaffected by addition of slurry. Higher soil water content at lower landscape position did not affect emissions of CH4 but did increase those of N2O in 2007. The current study was conducted at one field location. Examination of slurry additions to additional sites is required for reliable estimation of N2O emissions from slurry applied to perennial legume forages in prairie Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".