MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6959747672 · doi:10.1139/cjps2011-142

Phenotypic variation of side-oats grama grass [Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr.] collections from the Canadian prairie

2012· article· en· W6959747672 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioOne Complete (BioOne) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Regulatory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTiller (botany)ForageCultivarPoaceaePollenCrop

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schellenberg, M. P., Biligetu, B., McLeod, G. J. and Wang, Z. 2012. Phenotypic variation of side-oats grama grass [Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr.] collections from the Canadian prairie. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 1043-1048. Native prairie grasses are adapted to local climates and have the potential for development as forage grass cultivars for semiarid environments. Side-oats grama grass [Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr.] is a drought-tolerant grass with desirable forage characteristics, and is distributed across the Canadian prairies and throughout the Great Plains. Understanding ecotypic variability of this species is a prerequisite for developing populations suitable for drier regions of western Canada. A randomized complete block field plot was established using nine seed collections from Manitoba and Saskatchewan in 2006 near Swift Current (lat. 50°25′N, long. 107°44′W), Canada. Seed yield, tiller number, plant height, foliage diameter, and days to flower of individual plants were measured for each collection in the summers of 2007 and 2010. The Sidney and Wolseley collections had taller plants with greater basal diameter. Plants from these two collections also had higher tiller number, and required fewer days to reach flowering stage. However, there was no clear ranking of these variables among other collections. Averaged flowering date was Aug. 15 for Alexander, Sidney, and Wolseley collections, Aug. 21 for Wellwood, Glenboro, and Pratt collections, and Aug. 26 for Minto and Coulter collections, respectively. Taller plants with greater tiller number for the Sidney and Wolseley collections showed a potential for further cultivar development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.226
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.037 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it