MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intervention of Baduanjin Combined with Cognitive Training on Cognitive Frailty in Elderly Diabetic Patients: a Clinical Study

2023· article· en· W6959864842 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPasture and Agricultural Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionGrip strengthGlycated hemoglobinCognitive trainingIntervention (counseling)Marital statusResearch designType 2 diabetesCognitive Intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background At present, there are few intervention studies on cognitive frailty in elderly diabetic patients. This study aims to explore the application effect of Baduanjin combined with cognitive training in elderly diabetic patients with cognitive frailty, in order to provide reference for the management of this population. Objective To explore the intervention effect of Baduanjin combined with cognitive training on elderly diabetic patients with cognitive frailty. Methods A total of 84 elderly diabetic patients with cognitive frailty hospitalized in the Department of Endocrinology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital from October 2021 to April 2022 were selected as research subjects by convenient sampling method, and randomly divided into the experimental group (n=42) and the control group (n=42) according to the random number table method. The patients in the experimental group received Baduanjin exercise combined with cognitive training, 3 times per week for 12 weeks; patients in the control group were given routine exercise and health education. General data of the patients were collected, including gender, age, education level, marital status, residential status, personal monthly income, type of medical insurance and number of comorbid chronic diseases. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, Frailty Phenotype (FP) score, gait speed, grip strength and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were compared at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks of intervention between the two groups. Results During the study period, 3 cases were lost to follow-up in the control group and 2 cases were lost in the experimental group, a total of 79 patients were finally included (39 cases in the control group and 40 cases in the experimental group) . There was no significant difference in the general data between the two groups (P>0.05) . There were interaction effects of group and time on MoCA score, FP score, gait speed and grip strength (P<0.05) . MoCA score of patients in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group at 12 weeks of intervention (P<0.05) , and higher than that at baseline and 6 weeks of intervention (P<0.05) . FP score of patients in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group at 12 weeks of intervention, and lower than that at baseline and 6 weeks of intervention (P<0.05) . Gait speed and grip strength of patients in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group at 12 weeks of intervention, and higher than those at baseline and 6 weeks of intervention (P<0.05) . HbA1c level of patients in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, and lower than that at baseline at 12 weeks of intervention (P<0.05) . Conclusion Baduanjin combined with cognitive training can slow down the decline of cognitive function in elderly diabetic patients, improve physical frailty and reduce the blood glucose level of patients, which is suitable for vigorously promoting in the clinical and community settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.330
GPT teacher head0.517
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicPasture and Agricultural SystemsFrench-language works237,207