MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6960122948 · doi:10.11575/prism/39446

The Effects of Maximum Residue Limits on Trade: A Case of Canadian Wheat Export

2020· other· en· W6960122948 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Practices and Plant Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureProduction (economics)Pesticide residueInternational marketFood products

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wheat is Canada’s most produced crop, and Canada is one of the major wheat producers in the world. Canadian wheat production well exceeds the domestic demands, and thus more than half of the wheat production is being exported. With climate change and the increase in global food insecurity, Canada can play an essential role to feed the world. The success of the Canadian wheat industry depends on exports and market access. In addition to customary tariffs, non-tariff measures can affect trade. Maximum residue limits (MRLs) are a class of non-tariff measures. MRLs are the maximum levels of pesticide residues that remain in food and are deemed legally permitted. Codex Alimentarius Commission, an international standard-setting of the United Nations, vii establishes MRLs by applying science-based risk assessments. Following the Codex MRLs is voluntary, and countries can choose to develop their national MRLs as long as they abide by scientific methodologies that do not impede trade. States can decide to follow Codex or national MRLs. In either case, the domestic agricultural products, as well as the importing commodities, must meet the MRL requirements. The problem of MRLs has increased recently since countries started to develop national MRLs. The increasing number of unharmonized national MRLs create trade issues because by following the national MRLs, producers and farmers do not necessarily follow the importing countries’ regulatory requirements. A trade barrier occurs when the importing country’s MRLs are more stringent than the exporting countries’ MRLs. In addition, missing MRLs and pesticide bans add additional trade barriers. The complexity of the MRLs setting provides an opportunity for nationalistic and protectionist approaches to limit trade to promote national productions. The current literature has not reached a consensus on the effects of MRLs on trade. This report is the first quantitative analysis of the impacts of MRLs on Canadian wheat exports. In this study, the trade effects of five MRLs of major pesticides in wheat production were studied for 2018. A time-series analysis was also performed between 2014 and 2018. The gravity model and a bilateral stringency index were utilized for the econometric analysis. Although no wheat violations were reported for Canada in the last few years, the theoretical results show low MRLs can potentially act as trade barriers for Canadian wheat exports. Further studies are required to assess the exact values of the MRL impacts on trade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicAgricultural Practices and Plant GeneticsFrench-language works237,207