MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Items belonging to each variable.

2024· article· en· W6960608575 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPasture and Agricultural Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkplace violenceQuarter (Canadian coin)Emergency departmentOccupational safety and healthJob satisfactionHealth careHealth professionalsHuman factors and ergonomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div> Introduction Workplace violence is a relevant social problem due to its high prevalence and serious consequences. A quarter of workplace violence occurs in the healthcare sector. Evidence shows differences among professionals, with emergency department workers being especially vulnerable, presenting a higher risk of suffering mental and physical health problems, as well as threats to their professional and social integrity. Objective To explore the frequency with which emergency department professionals are exposed to user violence and violence by their own coworkers; as well as to analyze the differences between different professionals in exposure to violence in the workplace and some of its most studied consequences such as burnout, job satisfaction, engagement, and general health. Methods A descriptive comparative study was carried out with a sample of 120 emergency department workers from three hospitals in Alicante. The majority were healthcare professionals (84.2%), women (61.7%), obtaining a mean age of 41.8 years (SD = 10.8). Sociodemographic and occupational variables, user violence, violence among colleagues and superiors, general health, burnout, engagement, and job satisfaction were evaluated. Results A high prevalence of both physical and non-physical user violence in the healthcare setting was observed, especially affecting nursing and administrative assistants. In addition, significant differences were identified between professionals in terms of non-physical user violence, burnout, engagement, and job satisfaction. Administrative staff suffer greater non-physical user violence, while nursing assistants show higher levels of engagement. Regarding job satisfaction, nurses report higher intrinsic satisfaction. Medical staff, nurses and nursing assistants show higher levels of extrinsic satisfaction compared to administrative staff. Discussion Our results are consistent with other studies in which a relationship between exposure to violence and job satisfaction is observed. In addition, administrative staff appear to be the professionals most exposed to violence from both patients and coworkers. These results provide evidence for future research focused on improving the work environment and health of emergency department professionals. </div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0750.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicPasture and Agricultural SystemsFrench-language works237,207