Assessment of the modified Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (mASPECTS).
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p><b>A</b>. Differences according to recanalization in the T2*-weighted MR angiography (SWAN)-based mASPECTS. In the recanalization (R) and the no recanalization (NR) groups, the initial score was significantly lower than the follow-up score. <b>B</b>. Differences according to recanalization in the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-based mASPECTS. The initial score was significantly higher than the follow-up score in the NR group, but initial and follow-up scores in the R group were not significantly different. When comparing follow-up scores, those in the R group were significantly higher than those in the NR group. <b>C</b>. Differences in the SWAN-based mASPECTS, by stroke etiology. The initial cardioembolic stroke (CE) group score was significantly lower than the initial atherothrombotic stroke (AT) group score. <b>D</b>. Differences by stroke etiology in the DWI-based mASPECTS. The follow-up CE group score was significantly lower than the follow-up AT group score. Mann–Whitney U test: *<i>P</i> < 0.05, **<i>P</i> < 0.01.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.237 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it