MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6960988408 · doi:10.14989/287910

<特集 ヴァナキュラー・ツーリズムからみる南アジア --宗教・聖地・観光-- > The Times of India 紙デジタルコレクションが記録したスィク教徒の旅 --パキスタン・イスラーム共和国におけるグルドワーラー巡礼--

2024· article· ja· W6960988408 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Diaspora
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPilgrimageIslamHajjCommissionHinduismSouth asiaNew delhi

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pakistan issues pilgrimage visas to Indian Sikhs in compliance with the ‘1974 Protocol on Visits to Religious Institutions.’ In 2018, the Pakistan High Commission Office in New Delhi issued 3, 800 visas to Indian Sikhs. Indian pilgrims enter Pakistan through the Wagah border by rail or road and undertake pilgrimage to several sites. Large groups are organised, especially on the death anniversaries of gurus, the Vaisakhi (harvest festival) in April and the Guru Nanak Jayanti festival in November. For a few days every year in November, thousands of Sikhs gather at the city of Nankana Sahib in Pakistan to celebrate Guru Nanak Gurpurab -- the birth anniversary of Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism. They arrive from India, the Middle East, the UK, Europe, Canada, the US, and all over the world. It is one of the biggest pilgrimages in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. In this paper, focussing on the Sikh community, I clarified the historical situation of minority pilgrimages that has received very little attention in Pakistan and explored the social significance of these pilgrimages. An attempt was made to locate relevant articles from archives of The Times of India, an Indian newspaper, to reconstruct the historical narrative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicSouth Asian Studies and DiasporaFrench-language works237,207