MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact Analysis of Wall-Caisson Composite Structure Construction Adjacent to Rail Transit Bridge

2025· article· en· W6962537024 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Geotechnical Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiaphragm (acoustics)Deformation (meteorology)Composite numberCaissonExcavationStress (linguistics)Settlement (finance)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Objective] The construction deformation control adjacent to operational railways is of utmost importance in current rail transit planning and construction. Therefore, it is necessary to study the effect of the diaphragm wall-caisson composite structure (hereinafter referred to as WCCS)parameters on the structural stress deformation characteristics, which are caused by the caisson interior excavation and the change patterns of the surrounding soil displacement. [Method] In the case study of a composite structure construction project adjacent to Shanghai-Suzhou-Nantong Railway Bridge in Nantong City, the finite-element software is used to analyze the internal forces, deformations, and the surrounding ground settlement patterns of the WCCS. [Result & Conclusion] Firstly, the caisson under the protection of a circular diaphragm wall exhibits relatively small horizontal deformation. Increasing the thickness of both the caisson and diaphragm wall will reduce the maximum deformation and stress in the WCCS itself. However, within the 3~5 m width range of sandwiched soil, the widening of sandwiched soil leads to increased stress and deformation in the diaphragm wall, with a sudden spike particularly observed at the 5 m width of sandwiched soil. Secondly, the uplift value of the bottom-sealed concrete and sandwiched soil is less affected by the thickness of the WCCS. However, within the 3~5 m width range of sandwiched soil, the soil uplift value first increases and then decreases, with the turning point occurring at the 4.5 m width of sandwiched soil. Thirdly, increasing the thickness of the caisson and diaphragm wall reduces the boundary of surrounding ground settlement, with particularly significant weakening effect of the caisson thickness. The width of sandwiched soil has a significant impact on ground settlement, which begins to increase markedly when the width exceeds 3.5 m. Lastly, a well-designed WCCS can improve the stability of the caisson and reduce the deformation impact of caisson construction on the surrounding environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.411 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it