MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6962581219 · doi:10.17632/jj5bcydj3w

Effects of feeding sulfate trace minerals above recommendations on nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation, lactational performance, and trace mineral excretion in dairy cows

2024· dataset· en· W6962581219 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRumenDry matterExcretionIsovalerateNutrientTrace mineralDairy cattleFecesLactation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most trace minerals (TM) are fed above dairy cow requirements in commercial herds but their fate and effects on dairy cows have not been well documented. In this study, we evaluated the effects of feeding short-term sulfate TM above recommendations on apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients, rumen fermentation characteristics, serum concentrations, milk yield and composition as well as milk, fecal, and urinary TM excretion in mid-lactation dairy cows. Eight multiparous Holstein cows [average body weight: 684 (SD: 29) kg at 82 (SD: 10) days in milk] in a quadruple 2 × 2 cross-over design were fed a basal diet, differing in sulfate TM supplement concentrations, to provide either 0.11, 17, and 63 (control; CON) or 0.95, 114, and 123 (high trace minerals; HTM) mg of dietary Co, Mn, and Zn/kg of dry matter, respectively. Each experimental period had a 21-d adaptation to the diet, followed by a 10-d sample collection period. Feed ingredients and total feces and urine were collected during 4 consecutive d and rumen fluid was collected 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h relative to feeding. Milk yield was recorded daily and milk samples were collected on 4 consecutive milkings. Ingestion of Co, Mn, and Zn was higher for HTM compared to CON group by 216, 233, and 93%, respectively. Dry matter intake averaged 25.0 (SE = 0.6) kg/d, and apparent total-tract digestibility of major nutrients was similar between treatments. There was no measurable effect of HTM on ruminal pH, major volatile fatty acids, and protozoa counts. Isovalerate molar proportion was 9.4% greater for HTM compared to CON group. Neither milk yield (43.5 kg/d; SE = 0.8) nor milk fat and protein concentrations differed between treatments. Milk urea nitrogen concentration was significantly higher for HTM (11.7 mg/dL) compared to CON group (9.7 mg/dL; SE = 0.7). Fecal excretion of Co, Mn, and Zn increased by 223, 198, and 75%, respectively, for HTM compared to CON group. Urinary excretions of TM were marginal compared to feces, and only urinary Co and Mn were significantly higher for HTM than CON cows as similarly obtained for serum Co and Mn concentrations. Milk TM yields were not modified by treatments. In summary, short-term dietary sulfate TM supply over the recommendation did not improve cow performance but significantly increased fecal TM excretion, which could have impacts on TM accumulation in soils where manure is applied and could potentially result in leaching into nearby watersheds. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of high fecal TM excretion on the environment using the One Health approach. Moreover, the impacts of TM oversupply on milk production and cow health should be evaluated by long-term experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataFrench-language works237,207