Effects of feeding sulfate trace minerals above recommendations on nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation, lactational performance, and trace mineral excretion in dairy cows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most trace minerals (TM) are fed above dairy cow requirements in commercial herds but their fate and effects on dairy cows have not been well documented. In this study, we evaluated the effects of feeding short-term sulfate TM above recommendations on apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients, rumen fermentation characteristics, serum concentrations, milk yield and composition as well as milk, fecal, and urinary TM excretion in mid-lactation dairy cows. Eight multiparous Holstein cows [average body weight: 684 (SD: 29) kg at 82 (SD: 10) days in milk] in a quadruple 2 × 2 cross-over design were fed a basal diet, differing in sulfate TM supplement concentrations, to provide either 0.11, 17, and 63 (control; CON) or 0.95, 114, and 123 (high trace minerals; HTM) mg of dietary Co, Mn, and Zn/kg of dry matter, respectively. Each experimental period had a 21-d adaptation to the diet, followed by a 10-d sample collection period. Feed ingredients and total feces and urine were collected during 4 consecutive d and rumen fluid was collected 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h relative to feeding. Milk yield was recorded daily and milk samples were collected on 4 consecutive milkings. Ingestion of Co, Mn, and Zn was higher for HTM compared to CON group by 216, 233, and 93%, respectively. Dry matter intake averaged 25.0 (SE = 0.6) kg/d, and apparent total-tract digestibility of major nutrients was similar between treatments. There was no measurable effect of HTM on ruminal pH, major volatile fatty acids, and protozoa counts. Isovalerate molar proportion was 9.4% greater for HTM compared to CON group. Neither milk yield (43.5 kg/d; SE = 0.8) nor milk fat and protein concentrations differed between treatments. Milk urea nitrogen concentration was significantly higher for HTM (11.7 mg/dL) compared to CON group (9.7 mg/dL; SE = 0.7). Fecal excretion of Co, Mn, and Zn increased by 223, 198, and 75%, respectively, for HTM compared to CON group. Urinary excretions of TM were marginal compared to feces, and only urinary Co and Mn were significantly higher for HTM than CON cows as similarly obtained for serum Co and Mn concentrations. Milk TM yields were not modified by treatments. In summary, short-term dietary sulfate TM supply over the recommendation did not improve cow performance but significantly increased fecal TM excretion, which could have impacts on TM accumulation in soils where manure is applied and could potentially result in leaching into nearby watersheds. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of high fecal TM excretion on the environment using the One Health approach. Moreover, the impacts of TM oversupply on milk production and cow health should be evaluated by long-term experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".