MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6962655611 · doi:10.16904/envidat.551

CALISHTO campaign dataset for the publication On the Drivers of Ice Nucleating Particle Diurnal Variability in Eastern Mediterranean Clouds

2024· dataset· en· W6962655611 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolIce nucleusParticle (ecology)Planetary boundary layerMineral dustMediterranean climateParticle numberClimate changeParticle counter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This repository contains all observational data sets during CALISHTO campaign used for the paper: Gao, K., Vogel, F., Foskinis, R., Vratolis, S., Gini, M. I., Granakis, K., Zografou, O., Fetfatzis, P., Berne, A., Papagiannis, A., Möhler, O., Eleftheridadis, K., and Nenes, A.: On the drivers of ice nucleating particle diurnal variability in Eastern Mediterranean clouds, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, Preprint link: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-4378562/v1. CALISHTO campaign was conducted between 12 October and 27 November 2021 to observe ice nucleating particles and aerosol properties at the Helmos Hellenic Atmospheric Aerosol and Climate Change station in Eastern Mediterranean, to understand cloud-aerosol interactions. To evaluate the spatial-temporal variabilities and characteristics of ice nucleating particles, a high-time resolution ice nucleation spectrometer was employed and different online aerosol property measurements were conducted in-situ, including particle number concentration, particle size distribution, particle fluorescent properties, and particle chemical composition. In addition, planetary boundary layer conditions at the observation site were determined by remote sensing techniques employed at a lower site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→