MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6962784432 · doi:10.18163/urppchusj2015091001

A Comparative Analysis of Antibiotic and Antiviral Drug Use in Pediatrics and ObstetricsGynecology over 12 years (2000-2001, 2005-2006 and 2012-2013) using Defined Daily Doses and Days of Therapy

2015· article· en· W6962784432 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntibiotic Use and Resistance
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntibioticsFormularyAzithromycinMedical prescriptionDrugDefined daily doseAntimicrobialDrug Utilization Review

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: There are limited data published about antibiotics and antiviral consumption in terms of Defined Daily Doses (DDD) and Days Of Therapy (DOT) in Pediatrics and ObstetricsGynecology. Objectives: To characterize and quantify antimicrobial drug use as DDD/1000 patient-days per molecule, DOT/1000 patient-days per molecule, and mean dose (mg/kg/day) per molecule over a twelve-year period and explore the changes over time in Pediatrics and Obstetrics-Gynecology. Methods: Retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study, in a mother-child University Hospital Center, with 400 pediatric beds and 100 obstetric-gynecology beds. All inpatient (in Pediatrics and Obstetrics-Gynecology) who received one of the 51 authorized antibiotics or one of the 9 authorized antivirals on the institution’s local formulary in 2000-2001, 2005-2006 and 2012-2013 were included. Prescriptions from the emergency room and outpatient clinics were excluded. Data were extracted from the patients’ computerized medication profiles. We calculated DDD/1000 patient-days per molecule, DOT/1000 patient-days per molecule overall and for each molecule. The mean dose in mg/kg/day was calculated for each molecule for the ranges: ≤ 1.5 kg; > 1.5-5 kg; > 5-15 kg; > 15-30 kg; and > 30 kg. Results: Over 12 years: there was a 1.67-fold increase for antibiotics and a 3.77-fold increase for antivirals in the overall number of DDD/1000 patient-days. There was a 1.73-fold increase for antibiotics and a 2.57-fold increase for antivirals in the overall number of DOT/1000 patientdays. It reveals increases in dosage regimens for amoxicillinclavulanic acid, gentamicin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid. Nevertheless, azithromycin and erythromycin dosage regimens decrease. The antivirals data reveals no predictable tendencies. Conclusion: This retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study reported the use of anti-infectious drugs at a mother-child hospitalover a 12-year time period. Both the overall numbers of DDD/1000 patient-days and the DOT/1000 patient-days increased. It should be monitored on a continuous basis by antimicrobial stewardship program in healthcare settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntibiotic Use and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207