The School of Pythagoras, St. John's College, Cambridge: An Archaeological Excavation.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Excavations conducted at the School of Pythagoras, Cambridge, took place within and around a standing Grade I listed medieval building. Three significant results were obtained. Firstly, a substantial palaeochannel was identified, the presence of which was established via augering. Secondly, a relatively intensive sequence of Roman activity was encountered. This could be subdivided into three sub-phases. Commencing during the 1st to 2nd centuries AD, the earliest Roman activity - as primarily represented by redeposited ceramics and a relatively substantial assemblage of disarticulated human bone - appears to have comprised a largely 'off-stage' presence. Subsequently, however, around the early to mid 2nd century a degree of domestic/industrial occupation was established; concomitant with this phase, a metalled trackway was laid down and a series of pits and ditches were created. Yet by the mid 3rd century the associated settlement appears to have contracted in size and the site became instead the venue for a series of interments. Six articulated inhumations were encountered. Finally, the third result pertained directly to the School of Pythagoras itself. Excavations conducted within the north wing of the structure revealed that this portion of the building had been constructed contemporaneously with the principal range. Moreover, in combination with a review of the extant architectural evidence, the newly derived data demonstrates that the School of Pythagoras did not originally comprise an isolated rural manor - as has been widely assumed - but was in fact more akin to a substantial urban townhouse of the period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".