MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6962939575 · doi:10.17169/refubium-6260

Altered network oscillations and synaptic plasticity in the blood-brain\nbarrier-disrupted peri-infarct hippocampus are related to epileptiform\nactivity and impaired GABAergic inhibition

2018· dissertation· en· W6962939575 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRefubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean CommissionNational Institutes of HealthNova Scotia Health Research Foundation
KeywordsHippocampusHippocampal formationElectrophysiologyGABAergicLocal field potentialInhibitory postsynaptic potentialSynaptic plasticityNeuroplasticity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aquired epilepsies in the elderly often result from brain lesions associated\nwith bloodbrain barrier (BBB)-disruption like stroke, trauma, tumors or brain\ninfections. Post-stroke epilepsy can thereby be related to cognitive decline\nand poor neurological outcome. Seizures and spreading depolarization arise as\ncharacteristic activity from ischemic lesions but may also contribute to\nlesion progression and reorganization of the adjacent neural network and are\ntherefore critical electrophysiological correlates of the pathophysiology. As\nan important structure for memory consolidation but also as a very sensitive\narea for epileptogenesis, the hippocampus is a crucial structure for\ninvestigating mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of BBB-dysfunctional\ninduced changes in synaptic plasiticity and neural network activity. To\nelucidate mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology I investigated with a\nmulti-methodological approach different aspects of changes in rat hippocampus\nfollowing neocortical photothrombosis using magnetic resonance imaging,\nintracranial pressure and electrophysiological measurements as well as gene\nexpression analysis. Cortical photothrombosis was associated with early peri-\nischemic BBB dysfunction that included the underlying, ipsilateral hippocampus\nand increased intracranial pressure, both preceding the occurrence of\nvasogenic edema. Intrahippocampal field potential recordings revealed\nelectrographic seizures within the first week in two thirds of animals.\nPredominantly seizing animals displayed an increase in theta and reduction in\ngamma frequency bands indicating disturbed inhibitory activity. Synaptic\ninteractions and plasticity were studied in parasagittal hippocampal slices at\n24 hrs and 7 days post-stroke. Field potential recordings in CA1 and CA3\nuncovered multiple population spikes, epileptiform episodes and spreading\ndepolarizations at 24 hrs declining at day 7. However, input-output analysis\nrevealed that fEPSP-spike coupling was significantly enhanced at 7 days. In\naddition, CA1 feedback and feedforward inhibition were diminished over the\nfirst week. Slices generating epileptiform activity at 7 days revealed\nimpaired bidirectional long-term plasticity following high and low frequency\nstimulation protocols. Supporting these findings, microarray and PCR data\nconfirmed changes in expression of astrocyte-related genes and suggested\ndownregulation in expression of GABAA-receptor subunits. In conclusion, BBB\ndysfunction in the peri-infarct hippocampus is within the first week related\nto hyperexcitability, early disinhibition and abnormal synaptic plasticity.\nThus, the data reveal a strong connection between hippocampal neural networks\npresenting epileptiform activity and disturbed oscillatory activity as well as\nlong-term plasticity. These insights reveal possible new diagnostic monitoring\nopportunities in finding patients at risk for epileptogenesis and cognitive\nimpairment associated with peri-lesional BBB-dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRefubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin)Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207