MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6963069875 · doi:10.17632/dwth772x62

Photo Archive of In Situ Benthic Imagery from the Lophelia Coral Conservation Area

2022· dataset· en· W6963069875 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenthic zoneCoral reefCoralFaunaCanyonReefTaxon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lophelia Coral Conservation Area (LCCA) was established in 2004 to protect the only known cold-water coral reef in eastern Canada. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the closure (Beazley et al. 2021), benthic fauna were quantified from underwater images taken in 2003, 2009, and 2015 from each of three different strata: 1) inside the Lophelia reef footprint (LRF; Inside Reef), 2) inside the LCCA but outside of the LRF (Inside Closure), and 3) outside of the LCCA (Outside Closure) (Korabik et al. 2021). In addition, photos and video imagery were collected in 2002, 2007 and in 2018 (Beazley et al. 2019) and are included although they were not analyzed in Beazley et al. (2021). Here we provide the original photos for each of these strata/years in support of future monitoring of this area. Not all of these photos have been analyzed. In 2022 the LCCA was incorporated into the Eastern Canyons Conservation Area (ECCA). Version 3 includes an update to the Photo Archive Metadata to include a column indicating whether the photo was analyzed or not in Beazley et al. (2021). Additionally a spreadsheet of the abundance of each taxon per analyzed photo is included. Taxon names are matched with the images presented in Korabik et al. (2021). References (see linked files) BEAZLEY, L., C. LIRETTE & J. GUIJARRO, 2019. Characterization of the corals and sponges of the Eastern Scotian Slope from a benthic imagery survey. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3302: vi + 83 p BEAZLEY, L., E. KENCHINGTON, M. KORABIK, D. FENTON & M. KING, 2021. Other effective area-based conservation measure promotes recovery in a cold-water coral reef. Global Ecology and Conservation 26, e01485. KORABIK, M., E. BAKER, L. BEAZLEY, S. THOMPSON, M. BOUCHARD MARMEN & E. KENCHINGTON, 2021. A Pictorial Guide to the Epibenthic Megafauna of the Lophelia Coral Conservation Area Identified from In Situ Benthic Images. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3430: v + 142 p.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataFrench-language works237,207