MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6964085112 · doi:10.21227/j2bm-0919

LGC Dataset

2025· dataset· en· W6964085112 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE DataPort · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsXanadu Quantum Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPixelInfraredImage resolutionFocal lengthHigh resolutionProcess (computing)Thermal infrared

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is an uncooled LWIR dataset named LGC. It was captured utilizing the IRay Tech LGC6122 uncooled infrared core, a device also employed inpractical applications. A significant advantage of our dataset lies in the 72 mm focal length of the LGC6122, which facilitates the detection of human subjects at distances of up to 1.3 kilometers and vehicles at distances of 1.7 kilometers. In contrast, the FLIR dataset features a focal length of 13 mm, while the KAIST dataset has a focal length of 7.5 mm. The LGC6122 operates at a standard resolution of 640 × 512 pixels and functions withinthe 8–12 μm wavelength range, characteristic of typical LWIR detectors. The infrared images included in our dataset were captured at Kunming Pool Qixi Park in Xi’an, Shaanxi, China. Data collection occurred during nighttime and afternoon hours in both spring and winter seasons. The scenes represented in our dataset encompass buildings, lakes, and trees observed from considerable distances, thereby offering a diverse array of challenging scenarios for infrared image enhancement. Given the labor-intensive process of identifying appropriate locations for long-distance target detection, our dataset comprises a total of 668 images. 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it