MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Feasibility of intradialytic Exercise in a Rural Community Hemodialysis Unit : Mixed Methods Analysis of Implementation

2017· other· en· W6964426513 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemodialysisPopulationDialysisQuality (philosophy)Quality of life (healthcare)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The use of leg cycle ergometers (LCEs) during hemodialysis (HD) has been shown to have a number of benefits including improved adequacy of HD and blood pressure reduction while also improving exercise capacity, physical function and quality of life in patients with end stage kidney disease. LCEs have been implemented at several dialysis centres in major Canadian cities, however no known location in British Columbia. Furthermore, a gap exists in the literature with respect to the feasibility of implementing such programs in small or rural HD centres. We examined the feasibility of implementing LCEs concurrent with HD in a rural community hemodialysis unit.Methods: Study participants included patients and clinical care providers (CCPs) recruited from an independent community HD unit in Prince George, British Columbia. Descriptive statistics were used to indicate frequency, intensity and length of cycle utilization. Barriers and facilitators to participation were captured in individual semi-structured interviews conducted with patient and CCPs at the end of the study period. Transcribed interviews were coded and analyzed using a theoretical framework scaffolded by constructs of acceptability and feasibility of implementation (Ou2019Cathian et al. 2015). Results: Of 14 eligible patients, 9 enrolled of which 6 actively participated in the study. Over 1 to 4 months patients used LCEs an average of 85% (63%-100%) of their dialysis sessions. Duration of LCEs use increased over time from a low of 15 minutes to an average of 1 hour (15-120 minutes) at an u201ceasyu201d rate on the Perceived Exertion Scale with no adverse events reported. Thematic analysis of 14 interviews (9 patients; 5 CCPs) identified key elements for successful implementation: patient and CCP orientation and a structured support process aided in acceptability, resulting in minimal disruption to workflow and generating motivation to participate and a positive patient and CPP experience. Conclusion: Exercising during HD is acceptable, feasible, and safe when implemented in a rural/small community HD unit using a structured team-based approach. It does not add workload for clinical staff and can be incorporated in the workflow. Patients reported an overall positive experience and recommended the creation of an education tool to aid in recruitment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics, Open science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0890.075
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.011
Open science0.0140.012
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it