MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6964505333 · doi:10.25904/1912/1066

Modelling and Design of Advanced High Frequency Transformers

2014· other· en· W6964505333 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGriffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia) · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Ecology and Soil Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoGriffith University
KeywordsTransformerCapacitanceRenewable energyConvertersElectromagnetic coilCurrent transformerCoaxialEnergy storageElectromagnetic shielding

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon dioxide emission reduction has been a popular topic in recent years because it alleviates the current global warming crisis. Hence, there is an urgent need to adapt current technologies to help reduce carbon dioxide emissions before the global warming situation worsens. Amongst carbon dioxide reduction technologies, Electric Vehicle (EV) and renewable energy technologies are most likely to assist in improving this current status of the environmental issue in coming years. Due to increased interest in energy storage systems, such as EV and renewable energy, there is a pending need to improve the existing DC-DC converters used. The DC-DC converter systems used at present are usually bulky, costly and inefficient due to their low operating frequency. Hence, by increasing the operating frequency of the DC-DC converter, the size of the passive elements can be greatly reduced. Among these passive elements, the transformer occupies the most important role indisputably. A High Frequency Coaxial Transformer (HFCT), with a range of 1 kW to 20 kW was designed and introduced in this dissertation. The operating frequency was raised to between 100 kHz and 300 kHz in order to achieve high power densities and high performance efficiency. However, the coupling capacitance accompanied by an increased operating frequency (which couples high frequency noise between the primary and secondary windings) can cause serious common mode problems. Hence, the Faraday shield was placed between the windings of introduced transformers. This reduces the coupling capacitance and consequently the electromagnetic interference. The shielding effect analysis has been conducted to verify the HFCT performance with the insertion of the Faraday shield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGriffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)Same topicPlant Ecology and Soil ScienceFrench-language works237,207