Discovering key drivers of house price growth in eight Australian capital cities:1994-2017
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study adopts the user cost of housing framework and uses dynamic models to identify the key drivers of real house price growth in Australia's eight capital cities between 1994 and 2017. The real mortgage rate and the real investment loan growth rate are found to be significantly associated with real house price growth. A 25 basis points increase in the real mortgage rate will reduce the long-run growth rate of real house price in Sydney by about 0.69 per cent per quarter. A 1 percent increase in investment loan growth per quarter will increase the long-run real house price growth by 0.95 per cent per quarter in Sydney. The results show that investor demands have a lot more influence on house price growth than compared to owner-occupied demands in most Australian capital cities.The study also discovers that the price-to-rent ratio and population growth have strong influences on real house price growth. For most Australian Capital cities, economic factors explain around 50 t0 60 per cent of the variation i the growth rate of house prices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it