CO2 and CH4 Fluxes from Waterbodies, Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska, 2016-2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dataset provides estimates of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) diffusive fluxes from waterbodies, and watershed landcover data for the central-interior of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (YK delta), Alaska. Dissolved concentrations of methane and carbon dioxide were predicted using an integrated terrestrial-aquatic approach to scale observations based on landscape and waterbody remote sensing drivers. The observations include ~300 samples of surface water dissolved gases collected in July 2016-2019 from the central region of the YK Delta, Alaska. A machine learning model was used to generate estimated fluxes. Model inputs include Sentinel-2 MSI with derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and normalized difference water index (NDWI), an Arctic digital elevation model (DEM) with derived slope and flow accumulation, Sentinel-1 C-band July and December VV and VH composites, and a landcover map. Waterbody size, shape, and reflectance were determined using object-based image analysis in Google Earth Engine. Landscape-level input data were averaged in non-nested sub-basins calculated using the System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) "channel network" algorithm at three threshold sizes. Cross validation was used to tune and select variables for gradient boosting models. The trained gradient boosting models were then used to predict dissolved methane and carbon dioxide in all waterbodies (~17,000) in the region. These aquatic concentrations were converted to fluxes using an average gas transfer velocity from observations (0.33 m/d). The data are provided in GeoTIFF and shapefile formats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".