MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sex, Pain & Endometriosis : Co-Designing An Online Resource Through integrated Knowledge Translation

2017· other· en· W6965037735 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)PopulationmHealthContext (archaeology)CredibilityGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Endometriosis is a gynaecological disease that affects 1 in 10 women in Canada and is characterized by the presence of endometrial cells outside the uterus leading to painful periods, chronic pelvic pain, and sexual pain. Painful sex occurs in 50% of women with endometriosis, negatively influencing their sexual functioning and interpersonal relationships. Despite the prevalence and impact of painful sex, there is limited accessible, evidence-based information to help people understand their symptoms, seek appropriate health care, and make treatment decisions. Guided by patient-oriented research, the aim of this project was to develop an online platform for people with endometriosis-related sexual pain. Methods: Firstly, we conducted stakeholder focus groups with patients, clinicians, researchers and endometriosis organizations to determine the appropriate audience, content, mood and feel of the online platform. Secondly, we evaluated existing online resources for readability, suitability, and quality using validated eHealth tools. Finally, we developed content for the online platform informed by user-centred iterative design. Results: Hope, de-stigmatization, empowerment, connectedness, depth of information and credibility were identified by our stakeholder groups as important for an online platform. Our review suggest that existing online resources use medical/technical language, offer limited content, include long blocks of text and are not visually appealing. As a result, all content for our site including types of sexual pain, physical and psychological mechanisms, management and treatment options were conveyed through short plain language messages, visual images and design. Implications: The end product was an appealing, informative public website for a diverse audience. Further development and qualitative interviews will explore the user experience to determine additional information, support needs and self-management strategies leading to better health outcomes for people with endometriosis and painful sex.KT Approach: The cornerstone of this project was Integrated knowledge translation (iKT), which allowed for stakeholder/researcher co-design to ensure the product was fit for knowledge users. Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the Canadian Institute for Health Research for funding the project, Dr. Catherine Allaire, Dr. Christina Williams, Kate Wahl, Natasha Orr, Leah Tannock for reviewing content and Web Design company Tactica Interactive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0480.039
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0130.035
Open science0.0180.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.326
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.099 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)French-language works237,207