Optimization and coarse-grid selection for algebraic multigrid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multigrid methods are often the most efficient approaches for solving the very large linear systems that arise from discretized PDEs and other problems. Algebraic multigrid (AMG) methods are used when the discretization lacks the structure needed to enable more efficient geometric multigrid techniques. AMG methods rely in part on heuristic graph algorithms to achieve their performance. Reduction-based AMG (AMGr) algorithms attempt to formalize these heuristics. The main focus of this thesis is to develop e↵ective algebraic multigrid methods. A key step in all AMG approaches is the choice of the coarse/fine partitioning, aiming to balance the convergence of the iteration with its cost. In past work (MacLachlan and Saad, A greedy strategy for coarse-grid selection, SISC 2007), a constrained combinatorial optimization problem was used to define the “best” coarse grid within the setting of two-level reduction-based AMG and was shown to be NP-complete. In the first part of the thesis, a new coarsening algorithm based on simulated annealing has been developed to solve this problem. The new coarsening algorithm gives better results than the greedy algorithm developed previously. The goal of the second part of the thesis is to improve the classical AMGr method. Convergence factor bounds do not hold when AMGr algorithms are applied to matrices that are not diagonally dominant. In this part of our research, we present modifications to the classical AMGr algorithm that improve its performance on such matrices. For non-diagonally dominant matrices, we find that strength of connection plays a vital role in the performance of AMGr. To generalize the diagonal approximations of AFF used in classical AMGr, we use a sparse approximate inverse (SPAI) method, with nonzero pattern determined by strong connections, to define the AMGr-style interpolation operator, coupled with rescaling based on relaxed vectors. We present numerical results demonstrating the robustness of this approach for non-diagonally dominant systems. In the third part of this research, we have developed an improved deterministic coarsening algorithm that generalizes an existing technique known as Lloyd’s algorithm. The improved algorithm provides better control of the number of clusters than classical approaches and attempts to provide more “compact” groupings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".