The soul of the world: panpsychism and its relevance for contemporary philosophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Panpsychism -- the composite of pan, which means "all," and psyche, the Latinized form of the Greek psuche, or "soul" -- is the thesis that consciousness is a fundamental and ubiquitous feature of the universe. Although sometimes met with an incredulous stare, panpsychism is a metaphysical position which enjoys a long, venerable history that hearkens back to at least the Presocratic philosophers, but which eventually fell into relative obscurity with the rise of logical positivism in the 19th century. However, panpsychism is now once again gaining prominence in the contemporary philosophy of mind in response to the perceived logical and metaphysical insufficiencies of materialism, referred to as "physicalism" in contemporary literature, and dualism. Physicalism suffers chiefly from intelligibility problems, by virtue of how it relies on unintelligible explanations of consciousness, such as brute emergence into the realm of the physical. Conversely, dualism is threatened mainly by an empirical problem, namely with respect to how it fails to adequately integrate phenomenal consciousness into the scientific description of the world, which constitutes the famous "mind-body problem." Accordingly, panpsychism promises to overcome both sets of problems, first by positing consciousness as intrinsic to physical reality, and second, by suggesting that such intrinsic mental properties metaphysically ground or necessitate physical structure itself. As such, mental properties necessarily belong not only to composite entities such as human beings and other animals but, more controversially, also to the fundamental building blocks of reality. This does not, however, mean that panpsychism is immune to its own conceptual stumbling blocks, the most salient of which is known as the combination problem. The combination problem states that, given that organismal consciousness, or the kind of complex conscious experience that we have, is made up of an aggregate of smaller ''microexperiences," it is difficult to make sense of just how such microexperiences can collectively constitute unified "macroexperience." Although the combination problem threatens to undermine panpsychism, there are many proposed solutions and, if such solutions succeed, panpsychism seems to represent a more parsimonious conception of reality than either of its traditional alternatives, so it is important to take it seriously. This master's thesis intends to provide a comprehensive account of contemporary panpsychism as it exists today, in turn exploring the various solutions to the combination problem and other conceptual barriers and ultimately arguing for the legitimacy -- if not the preferability -- of a panpsychist metaphysics. While similar projects have already been done, my thesis will be novel in that it will provide both a contribution from Continental philosophy (which is normally neglected in the extant literature), and describe how panpsychism is practically useful for other philosophically relevant issues, especially regarding the ecological crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.047 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".