MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6967465257 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10417466

Pipunculus planus Ramos-Pastrana & Marques & Rafael 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6967465257 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCephalopods and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaPhallus (fungus)HolotypeApex (geometry)Lobe

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pipunculus planus sp. nov. Figs 27–39, 40 Type material. (5 ♂). HOLOTYPE. Male: COLOMBIA, Boyacá, SFF [Santuario de Fauna y Flora] Iguaque, Qda.[Quebrada] Los Mudos, Malaise, 05º44’N / 73º26’W, 2840 m [eters], 14.II–14.III.2003, P. Reina leg., M3637 (1 ♂, IAvH) (photographed specimen). PARATYPES. idem Cab. [Cabaña] Chaina, 05º25’N / 73º27’W, 2550 m [eters], 01–14.feb. [II].2001, A. Roberto leg., M1271 (2 ♂, LEUA); idem (1 ♂, LEUA); idem (1 ♂, INPA). Holotype with left wing mounted on a microslide with Canada balsam. Left antenna and terminalia placed in a microvial with glycerin, both pinned along the specimen. Diagnosis. Male.Antenna dark brown; postpedicel with acute apex. Wing with anal lobe large. Coxae shiny dark brown. Mid tibia with distinct apical spines; hind tibia with an acute process posteroapically and outstanding setae anteromedially.Abdomen velvety dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, giving the appearance of longitudinal bands dorsally. Syntergosternite 8 with membranous area large. Surstyli subsymmetrical, with inner and outer margins curved, apices rounded and slightly inward directed. Apex of phallic guide with translucent and distinct lobe and one row of inconspicuous setae laterally. Ejaculatory apodeme narrowed, bottle-shaped. Phallus with ejaculatory ducts coiled, distinctly separated in distal half. Description. MALE (holotype). Body length 4.5 mm. Head (Figs 27–28). Eyes contiguous for 18 facets. F, EM, V (mm) = 0.4, 0.4, 0.1. Frontal triangle brown pruinose, with conspicuous dark brown callus. Occiput brown, brown pruinose dorsally and upper half laterally, gray pruinose in lower half laterally and ventrally. Antenna (Fig. 29) dark brown; scape with one seta dorsally; pedicel with three setae dorsally and two ventrally; postpedicel with acute apex. LPP/WPP = 2.2. Thorax (Figs 27–28, 30). Postpronotal lobe brown, brown pruinose. Scutum dark brown, brown pruinose, with dorsocentral setae; long and brown setae covering basal third. Notopleuron concolorous with scutum. Scutellum concolorous with scutum. Mesopleuron brown, gray-brown pruinose. Mediotergite brown, brown pruinose. Wing (Fig. 31). Length 5.8 mm. LW/MWW = 3.5; LTC/LFC = 1.3. Membrane brown infuscate; anal lobe large. Halter stem brown; knob yellowish brown. Legs (Fig. 27). Coxae shiny dark brown, gray-brown pruinose, with apices yellowish brown; trochanters shiny brown, brown pruinose; femora shiny dark brown, with apices yellowish brown, ventral ctenidia and a row of long and fine yellow setae posterolaterally; tibiae shiny dark brown, with bases yellowish brown; fore and hind tibiae with a patch of short and fine setae yellow, giving fluffy appearance in distal two thirds posteriorly; fore tibia without distinct apical spines; mid tibia with distinct apical spines; hind tibia with a process acute posteroapically and outstanding setae anteromedially; tarsomeres 1–4 brown, 5 dark brown; pulvilli yellowish brown. Abdomen (Figs 27–28, 32). Ground color velvety dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, giving the appearance of longitudinal bands dorsally, shiny posterolaterally, with inconspicuous setae scattered dorsally and long and fine setae brownish yellow laterally, about 3 times longer than dorsal seta; tergites and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 33. Syntergosternite 8 dark brown, brown pruinose, slightly shorter than tergite 5, with membranous area large (Fig. 34). Terminalia (Figs 33–39). Epandrium and surstyli dark brown (Fig. 34). Surstyli (Figs 34–36) subsymmetrical, shorter than length of epandrium, with long setae in outer margins. Both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with inner and outer margins curved, apex rounded, and slightly inward directed (Fig. 34); left surstylus slightly thinner than right (Fig. 34); both surstyli with apices forward directed, left surstylus with apex rounded, right surstylus with an acute apex when seen in lateral view (Figs 35–36). Gonopods asymmetrical; left gonopod thicker than right (Fig. 37). Apex of phallic guide stout, with tip thin hook-shaped, translucent distinct lobe and one row of inconspicuous setae laterally (Fig. 38). Ejaculatory apodeme narrowed, bottle-shaped (Fig. 39). Phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts coiled, distinctly separated in distal half (Fig. 38). FEMALE. Unknown. Geographical distribution. Colombia (Boyacá) (Fig. 40). Etymology. From the Latin ‘ planus ’ (= flat), referring to the dorsoventral flat areas of the ejaculatory ducts of the phallus in the male terminalia. Habitat. The specimens were collected in the Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque reserve, where the vegetation is composed of Andean cloud forests of the cordillera of the Northeast region of Colombia. Taxonomic notes. Based on males, P. planus sp. nov. is similar in appearance to P. kotaneni Skevington, 1998. It differs from P. kotaneni by having postpedicel with acute apex (versus postpedicel with obtuse apex); frontal triangle brown pruinose (versus frontal triangle silver grey pruinose); occiput brown pruinose dorsally and upper half laterally, gray pruinose in lower half laterally and ventrally (versus occiput silver-grey pruinose ventrally and laterally, not pruinose dorsally); tibiae shiny dark brown, with bases yellowish brown (Fig. 27) (versus tibiae brownish black); mid tibia with distinct apical spines (versus mid tibiae without distinct apical spines); hind tibia without distinct apical spines (versus hind tibia with distinct apical spines); abdomen dark brown, shiny posterolaterally (Figs 27–28, 32) (versus abdomen black, sparsely gray pruinose laterally); apex of phallic guide with lobe and one row of inconspicuous setae laterally (Fig. 38) (versus apex of phallic guide without lobe laterally and with tuft of setae apically [see figure 33f, presented by Skevington & Marshall (1998)].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCephalopods and Marine BiologyFrench-language works237,207