REHOUSE public report: Definition of the long-term performance tests of the components of the RPs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary: This REHOUSE public report (D3.3) describes and plans the needed procedures that will lead to the intermediate demonstration at TRL6 of the REHOUSE Renovation Packages (RP) through long-term performance testing, along with all the activities proposed in order to evaluate the properties of their materials, components and systems.D3.3 and Task 3.3 of WP3 “MEASUREMENT, EVALUATION AND LEARNING METHODOLOGY, IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PLATFORMS SPECIFICATIONS” are directly related to the (confidential) Deliverable 2.4 and Task 2.4 of WP2 “RENOVATION PACKAGES DESIGN, SPECIFICATION & DIGITALISATION (TRL6 DEMONSTRATION)”, where all the testing activities, simulations and measurements will be carried out to certify that the renovation packages can operate in relevant environment (TRL6). Throughout the different chapters of this public report is possible to find a brief description of the Renovation Packages (RPs) and their components (detailed specifications and characteristics of the Renovation Packages/technologies are included in (confidential) Deliverable 2.2 “Detailed specification of the renovation packages”), the methodology and actions carried out to fulfil Task 3.3, a brief overview of the legislative situation in the European Union related to testing procedures in buildings and their components, in addition to listing and describing some existing testing techniques and methods that are commonly used and therefore potentially used as part of the REHOUSE project.The most relevant part of this report is the selection and definition of the methods and testing procedures that will be executed for each Renovation Package to prove their transition from their current TRL (4/5) to TRL6. The procedures that will be followed for most of the RPs include a pre-assembly phase of testing, a prototype phase and a post-assembly phase. The detailed methods and the results of the application of these testing procedures to the Renovations Packages will be presented in Deliverable 2.4 “Report of the long-term performance tests of the components of the RPs” of work package (WP) 2. Further public reports of the REHOUSE project: Publications – REHOUSE
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.061 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".