Bibliographic record
Abstract
182. Hoplandria (Hoplandria) lateralis (Melsheimer) (Illustrations in Génier 1989, Klimaszewski et al. 2018), Table 1 References. Melsheimer 1844. Kraatz 1857. Fenyes 1920. Casey 1910. Génier 1989. Caterino and Chatzimanolis 2007. Webster et al. 2009. Brunke et al. 2012. Klimaszewski et al. 2018. Distribution. Nearctic. Canada: NB, ON, QC. USA: AR, AZ, CA, DC, FL, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, LA, MD, ME (NSR), MI, MO, NC, NH (NSR), NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, PA, SD, TN, TX, VA, WV. Mexico. Collection and Habitat data. The NH specimens were captured in grasses, pine-oak barrens, and an abandoned beaver pond area; primarily taken by flight intercept traps. Collected in May (1 female) and from July to October. Elsewhere found in hardwood forests: on human feces, on carrion of various animals (fish, bat, mouse), in malt trap, pitfall trap baited with soybeans, pitfall traps in oak-hickory forest, leaf litter, and sifting wood chips. Some were collected by sweeping broom sedge, in an ultraviolet light trap, and by treading mud on river (Génier 1989, Webster et al. 2009, Brunke et al. 2012). Material. USA, Maine, York Co.: West Lebanon, 29.VII–10.VIII.1991, D.W. Barry, FIT, 1 male. New Hampshire, Grafton Co.: Bedell Bridge St. Park @ Oliverian Brook, 20.VIII–8.IX.1992, 1 female; 9–29.IX.1992, D.S. Chandler, FITrap, 1 female; 23.V.1992, D.S. Chandler, sweep grasses, 1 female. Merrimack Co.: Concord Airport 1 mi E Concord, CZ-4a, 9–22.VIII.2001, D.S. Chandler, pine-oak barrens, FIT, 2 males. Strafford Co.: Thompson Farm, 3.5 km SW Durham, 43.1127, -70.9486, 14m, 29.IX–13.X–2005, beaver pond area, FIT, 1 male; 1– 15.IX.2005, beaver pond area, pitfall, 1 female; 29.IX–13.X.2005, ZOOL 745/845 class, beaver pond area, pitfall, 1 female.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".