Bibliographic record
Abstract
Geomys bursarius (Shaw 1800) [Mus] bursarius Shaw 1800, Philosophical Magazine, 6: 215. Type Locality: USA, upper Mississippi Valley (restricted to Minnesota, Sherburne Co., Elk River by Swenk, 1939). Vernacular Names: Plains Pocket Gopher. Subspecies:: Subspecies Geomys bursarius subsp. bursarius (Shaw 1800) Subspecies Geomys bursarius subsp. illinoensis Komarek and Spencer 1931 Subspecies Geomys bursarius subsp. industrius Villa and Hall 1947 Subspecies Geomys bursarius subsp. jugossicularis Hooper 1940 Subspecies Geomys bursarius subsp. lutescens Merriam 1890 Subspecies Geomys bursarius subsp. major Davis 1940 Subspecies Geomys bursarius subsp. majusculus Swenk 1939 Subspecies Geomys bursarius subsp. missouriensis McLaughlin 1958 Subspecies Geomys bursarius subsp. ozarkensis Elrod, Zimmerman, Sudman, and Heidt 2000 Subspecies Geomys bursarius subsp. wisconsinensis Jackson 1957 Distribution: SC Manitoba (Canada) to NW Indiana, SC Texas, and NE New Mexico (USA). Conservation: IUCN – Lower Risk (lc). Discussion: Revised by Merriam (1895 a) and, in part, by Honeycutt and Schmidly (1979) and by Heaney and Timm (1983 a), who considered lutescens a valid species (see also Heaney and Timm, 1985; Jolley et al., 2000). Burns et al. (1985), Sudman et al (1987), and Elrod et al. (2000) listed lutescens as a subspecies of bursarius, which is followed here. Elrod et al. (2000) mapped the ranges of all subspecies recognized by Hall (1981).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".