Anthophila fabriciana Choreutidae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
29. Anthophila fabriciana (Linnaeus, 1767) (Choreutidae) Phalaena fabriciana Linnaeus, 1767: 880. Type locality: [Europe]. BOLD:AAC8582 Palearctic distribution. Widespread in the Palaearctic region. New North American records. Canada: Manitoba, Churchill, 8 Aug 2006, 1 ♀ (CNC). Diagnosis. In wing maculation this species resembles plenicanata Heppner, and to a lesser extent alpinella (Busck) (Heppner 2011). In male genitalia, the valva has a pointed dentiform projection in the middle of its dorsal margin, the phallus is shorter than the uncus-tegumen-vinculum and has a short dentiform median lateral projection (shown in lateral view in Fig. 29); it is more similar to alpinella (Busck) but in the latter both the medio-dorsal tooth of the valva and that of the phallus are larger, and its phallus is longer than the uncus-tegumen-vinculum. The female genitalia is distinctive, though overall similar to those of alpinella, with its long, tightly coiled ductus bursae and heavily sclerotized, roundly conical, wrinkled sternum 8 and ostial area. Larval host. Urtica, Parietaria (Urticaceae). Note. Undoubtedly more widespread than the single record indicates. Like other Choreutidae, this species is diurnal. In Europe this species occurs in backyards where its host plants grow. The host plants are frequently associated with anthropogenic habitats thus it is conceivable that fabriciana may be a recent introduction. Although the locality of Churchill is remote, it is accessible by train and it is a shipping port. Railroads are often lined with introduced plants and can provide a pathway for alien species to disperse deep into natural areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".