TABLE 1 in Wood Anatomical and Hydraulic Traits of Tamarix Species Across a Large Eurasian Gradient Show a Stronger Climatic Than Phylogenetic Signal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TABLE 1 | Geographical distribution, morphology and special features of the studied Tamarix speciesa, arranged from the East to the West of their distribution areas. Tamarix speciesDistributionTypical habitatGrowth formHeight (m)Leaf longevitySpecial featuresT. ramosissimaNorth Korea, China, Russia, Mongolia, Tibet, Central Asia, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Ukraine, Eastern TurkeySalty shores of lakes and marshes, salty riverbanks, salty steppes, desertShrub, shrubby tree1–5 (6)DeciduousPhreatophyte, formation of cone-shaped sand dunes (nebkas)T.hispidaRussia, N China, Mongolia, Central Asia, Afghanistan, IranSandy hills, flats and marshes, salty banks of rivers, sand dunes in desertsShrub or small tree1.5–4 (6)DeciduousPhreatophyte, extreme halophyteT. aphyllaW Asia (to NW India, Pakistan, Afghanistan), Middle East, N Africa (to Eritrea, Somalia, Kenya, Ethiopia)Sandy soil and dunes, banks of canals and rivers, salty desertsShrub or treeUp to 12 (20)DeciduousPhreatophyte, tallest Tamarix species, sheathing leavesT. niloticaIsrael, Palestine, Lebanon, NE Africa to Kenya, Ethiopia and SomaliaOn saline sandy soils at river and canal banks, pond edges, springs, rim of wadis, dry lowlandsShrub or tree2–5EvergreenVery drought-hardy, highly salt tolerantT. negevensisIsrael, PalestineSaline shores and other salty sites, maquis, desertSmall treeUp to 2–4EvergreenThermophilous halophyteT. boveanaSpain, Maghreb to W LibyaWadis, riverbanks, borders of swamps, salt marshesLarge shrub or small treeUp to 10Deciduous or marcescentPhreatophyte, hyper-halophilousT. gallicaWestern Mediterranean countries, MaghrebShrubland of wadis and riverbanks, humid places near the seashore, salt marshesShrub or tree2–10Deciduous or marcescentPhreatophyte, climax vegetation on sandy loam, good resprouting under drought aInformation retrieved from Abd el-Ghani & Amer (2003), Abdelgawad (2017), Baum (1978), Beech (2018), CABI (2022), Castroviejo et al. (1995), Danin and Fragman-Sapir (2016), Encyclopedia of Life (EOL) (2008), Flora of China (FOC) (2024), Ighbareyeh, Cano-Ortiz, and Cano (2021, 2022), Iqbal et al. (2024), Lavaine, Evette, and Piégay (2015), Molina et al. (2004), The World Flora Online (WFO) (2024); Villar et al. (2012, 2019), Zohary (1982, 1987).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".