MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6967957798 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15146954

TABLE 1 in Typification and taxonomy of Echinophora scabra (Echinophoreae, Apioideae)

2023· dataset· en· W6967957798 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTypificationVascular bundleBundleTaxonomy (biology)PedicelTable (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TABLE 1. Morphologic, anatomic and micromorphologic comparison of E. scabra and related species, E. sibthorpiana and E. tenuifolia CharacterE. scabraE. sibthorpianaE. tenuifoliastempaucifoliousleafyleafyUmbel diameter3.2–4 cm1.8–2.8 cm2.2–3 cmRaypurplish flattened at basegreen cylindricalgreen cylindricalBractlets distributionspread over the umbellulaarranged in a circlearranged in a circleNumber of umbellula’s male pedicels4–58–106–8Length of umbellula’s male pedicels2–4.5 mm5–8 mm3–5.5 mmUmbellula’s central flower’s sepalabsentpresentpresentLength of umbellula’s male flowers’ sepal1.2–7 mm0–1.5 mm0.2–3 mmPetals shapeobovate, emarginateobovateobovateLength of style2–3.7 mm1.6–2.5 mm1.5–2 mmStyle indumentumalmost glabrouspubescentpubescentMericarp position in umbellulaalmost surrounded in pedicel cavityfreefreeSmall mericarp shape in transverse sectionalmost roundcrescent-shapecrescent-shapeHypodermal collenchymaabsent or few layersmultilayersmultilayersVallecular vittae shapelarge ellipticsmall ellipticsmall ellipticWidth to thickness ratio of vallecular vittae in large mericarp2.5–4.9 (–7.5)1.9–3.81.7–2.7Commissural vittae shapelarge ellipticsmall ellipticsmall ellipticWidth to thickness ratio of median vascular bundle in large mericarp10–13.58.6–10.17–9Width to thickness ratio of lateral vascular bundles in large mericarp8–134.1–76.5–7Width to thickness ratio of marginal vascular bundles in large mericarp6.7–133.5–85–9Relative size of vascular bundles and vallecular vittaevascular bundles smaller than vallecular vittaevascular bundles larger than vallecular vittaevascular bundles larger than vallecular vittaeWidth to thickness ratio of endosperm0.9– 0.931–1.21.01ratio of endosperm furrow depth to endosperm thickness0.55–0.60.68–0.720.76Length of mericarp’s hair30–460 µ20–150 µ7–88 µMericarp’s hair in transvers sectionround or almost flatalmost roundalmost roundSize of the platelet secretions on mericarp surface2.5–8 µ5–20 µ2.5–50 µ

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→French-language works237,207→