Neoliberalismo na educação: como reagir? Uma reflexão estratégica a partir de Foucault
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O autor procurou reconstruir a trajetória dos estudos sobre a neoliberalização da educação, para então estabelecer a posição de Foucault nesse contexto. Durante vários anos, a obra do filósofo francês permaneceu, pelo menos na França, longe das análises sobre o neoliberalismo. Mas, com a publicação dos cursos nos quais Foucault analisa o neoliberalismo, uma nova corrente de estudos foucaultianos emergiu. Houve uma tentativa de retorno à interpretação foucaultiana tendo em vista as mudanças ocorridas na sociedade desde as palestras do filósofo. O livro A Nova Razão do Mundo: Ensaio sobre a sociedade neoliberal, de Christian Laval e Pierre Dardot, está na origem desse movimento de atualização do diagnóstico de Foucault. Surgiram muitos estudos apresentando um novo diagnóstico dos sistemas educativos que, embora não mencionassem Foucault, baseavam-se na Nova Razão do Mundo. Os cursos do filósofo francês deram origem a uma nova geração de pensadores e pesquisadores responsáveis por restabelecer o caráter de crítica política radical da obra de Foucault.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".