IMPACT OF HALOPHYTE ASSOCIATION ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF LAVANDULA DENTATA UNDER SALT STRESS CONDITIONS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Salinity represents a major challenge to plant growth, prompting exploration of strategies to improve resistance. This study focuses on Lavandula dentata and its associations with the halophytes Atriplex prostrata and Plantago macrorhiza under salt stress conditions. Key morphological and physiological parameters were analyzed, including biomass, above-ground length, root length, root volume, leaf water content, chlorophyll, proline, and total sugar content. The results show that combining Lavandula dentate with the halophytes Atriplex prostrata and Plantago macrorhiza produced significant improvements over cultivation alone. Biomass increased by 35%, above-ground length by 25%, and root length by 40% in the presence of halophytes, while leaf water content rose by 15% and chlorophyll by 20%, while proline content fell by 10%. The correlation results show significant correlations between several physiological parameters, including a strong correlation of 0.856 between biomass and length of aerial part, as well as other notable associations between the different parameters measured. Concerning principal component analysis (PCA), the first two principal components explain 81.4% and 8.2% of the total variance, respectively. Prin1 is mainly influenced by biomass, above-ground length, and chlorophyll content, while Prin2 is influenced by biomass, above-ground length, and total sugar content. These analyses offer valuable insights into the interactions and adaptations of Lavandula dentata in response to salt stress, potentially applicable to optimizing plant resilience in saline environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".