Drosophila (Sophophora) miranda Dobzhansky 1935
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drosophila (Sophophora) miranda Dobzhansky Drosophila miranda Dobzhansky, 1935: 377. DIAGNOSIS: Edge of facial carina slightly flattened; acrostichal setae in 8 rows; distinguished from sympatric species D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis by body being larger (by 10%–15%), darker (especially the legs), and sex comb with more teeth: ta1 with usually 8 teeth (ranging from 6–10), ta2 with usually 6 (ranging from 5–8); acrostichals in 8 rows. TYPE: Holotype, ♂: Olympic Mts. Washington [no collector or date, handwritten] / TYPE [red label, printed]. In AMNH. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Six paratypes, same label data as holotype; 9 specimens: Prairie Creek S.P. [State Park], Calif. July 1951 / M.R. Wheeler, W.B. Heed / 2179.2. In AMNH. DISTRIBUTION: This species has one of the narrowest distributions in the group north of Mexico; it is relatively rare compared to the sympatric D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis, preferring cool, wet coastal and montane forests of the Pacific Northwest. Its northern extent is Vancouver Island, south in the Cascade Range to Mt. Whitney and to the Monterey Peninsula in California. COMMENTS: I have not studied the female terminalia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".