MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968170401 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15181920

How much water is in prison in our world?

2025· other· en· W6968170401 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrisonQuarter (Canadian coin)Water cycleFresh waterAtmosphere (unit)Water scarcity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hydrological cycle describes the continuous movement of water above and below the Earth's surface. This cycle includes the journey of water from the oceans and seas to the atmosphere, from the atmosphere to the Earth's surface, and back to the seas and oceans. This term reflects the fact that Earth's water resources neither increase nor decrease over time. Is the hydrological cycle sustainable today? Could it be delayed due to unnatural processes? We want to emphasize in this article concerns “liquids in bottles that are discarded”, this is a concern for every individual and whose use has increased relatively in the last 100 years and continues to do so. Changing this practice is the responsibility of every individual. When we were about to throw away the last quarter liter of drinks, we realized that there was liquid in them (like fresh water and cola in plastic bottles). What should we do? We poured the fresh water into the flowers and the cola into the sink. We could estimate how long that water would remain trapped in plastic bottles. About 200 years. We have always paid attention to this since then, if it becomes more widespread, it will affect all foods containing liquid. Ice left in cold drinks, water wasted with meals... We got very interesting answers when we asked our students. What do you do with the liquids left in plastic bottles? Some give them to aquariums, some to flowers.The total number of people who have lived (and continue to live) in the last 100 years is ~100-110 billion individuals (8.2 billion of them are still alive). How many of these individuals discard plastic bottles containing potable water? Moreover, plastic, which has entered human society in recent years, has another negative effect on natüre, i.e. the lack of decomposition These plastic bottles trap potable water. The question to be answered concerns how much water a person may waste by entrapment in plastic bottles throughout their lifespan? The answer is likely to be a staggering amount!Isn't throwing water in the trash a temporary interruption to the water cycle? Which is more important - freeing water or recycling plastic bottles. Come on, let's recycle plastic bottles from now on, and free the water inside them to nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEarth Systems and Cosmic EvolutionFrench-language works237,207