MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968231890 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.2538182

3D Camera Market Revenue, Trends, Players, Demand and Opportunities by 2022

2019· article· en· W6968231890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicQuality of Life Measurement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRidiculousFrugalityTracking systemPopulationFeature (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global 3D camera market is expected to witness a CAGR of 50.2% during the period 2016-2022, registering revenue of $19,893.0 million by 2022. The application of 3D camera in professional cameras’ has dominated the application segment of 3D camera market, with 66% share in the global market.\n\n\nRequest for a free sample copy of this research report @ https://www.psmarketresearch.com/market-analysis/3d-camera-market/report-sample\n\n\nThe technologically advanced products paired with rising penetration of smartphones would further fuel the market for 3D camera. The developing economies such as India and China are witnessing the major growth prospects for 3D camera. Remote monitoring and home automation & surveillance are other areas of applications, which would witness rise in adoption for 3D camera during the forecast period.\n\n\nThe 3D camera market is segmented into target camera and free camera, based on its type. Currently, free cameras have dominated the market owing to its less complexity in design. The dominance of free cameras would continue throughout the forecast period and would reach to a market value of $13,465.6 million by 2022, growing at CAGR of 49.6% during the forecast period.\n\n\nBased on the applications, the 3D camera market is bifurcated into professional cameras, smartphones, tablets, computer and others. Other applications includes mobile robots and home automation equipment. Professional cameras accounted for higher revenue share in 2015, however the maximum growth is expected to be witnessed in tablet segment during the forecast period.\n\n\nThe 3D camera market is segregated into North America, Europe, APAC (Asia Pacific), and LAMEA (Latin America, Middle East & Africa), based on the geographies. The market for 3D camera was dominated by North American region till 2014, however, it is estimated that Asia-Pacific would show its dominance from 2015 onwards, attaining a market value of $8,223.9 million in 2022.\n\n\nExplore report description @ https://www.psmarketresearch.com/market-analysis/3d-camera-market\n\n\nSony Corporation, Nikon Corporation, GoPro Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Canon Inc., Panasonic Corporation, LG Electronics Faro Technologies Inc., Eastman Kodak Company and Fujifilm Holdings Corporation are the major companies highlighted in this report. Product launch and collaboration are the two key strategies the major players are adopting to penetrate the major market.\n\n\nAbout P&S Intelligence\n\n\nP&S Intelligence, a brand of P&S Market Research, is a provider of market research and consulting services catering to the market information needs of burgeoning industries across the world. Providing the plinth of market intelligence, P&S as an enterprising research and consulting company, believes in providing thorough landscape analyses on the ever-changing market scenario, to empower companies to make informed decisions and base their business strategies with astuteness.\n\n\nContact: \nP&S Intelligence\nToll-free: +1-888-778-7886 (USA/Canada)\nInternational: +1-347-960-6455\nEmail: enquiry@psmarketresearch.com\nWeb: https://www.psmarketresearch.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicQuality of Life MeasurementFrench-language works237,207