Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zeugophora puberula Crotch (Figs. 120, 172) Reared specimens. VERMONT: Windham Co., Marlboro, Hogback Mountain Conservation Area, 5.ix.2018, em. 8.v.2019, C.S. Eiseman, ex Populus tremuloides, # CSE5253 (1 adult, MLBM). Hosts. * Salicaceae: Populus tremuloides Michx.; adults have also been reported from Salix (Clark 2000). Biology. The habits of this species are as Strickland (1920) described for Zeugophora scutellaris Suffrian. Adults window-feed in small patches on either leaf surface, leaving the veins intact. The egg is inserted in a cavity chewed in the lower surface and causes a brown spot to appear on the upper surface. The larva forms an upper-surface blotch mine that is dark brown, soon turning blackish, and no frass pattern is discernible (Fig. 120). The two collected leaf mines each had a lobed shape, influenced to some extent by the larger veins and adult feeding sites. When finished feeding, both larvae exited their mines and burrowed into soil (the second one on 12 September). Parasitoid. A female of Lathrolestes zeugophorae Barron (Ichneumonidae) emerged from the soil in late June (CSE5423, CNC). This wasp has previously been reared from undetermined Zeugophora spp. in Canada (Barron 1994). Notes. This is apparently the first rearing record for Zeugophora puberula, as well as the first record of this species from Vermont (Riley et al. 2003).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".