Features of psychological support for nurses in children's hospitals under martial law
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. Martial law presents significant challenges for nurses working with children. Children's hospitals are becoming institutions that provide not only medical care but also comprehensive medical and social support for both children and their families. Aim. To analyse the provision of psychological support in the professional activities of nurses in the paediatric unit. Materials and Methods. A survey on the psychological aspects of nurses’ work was conducted in April 2024 among the parents of 20 children from the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department of the Municipal Non-Profit Enterprise "Chernihiv Regional Children's Hospital" of Chernihiv Regional Council. An anonymous questionnaire of our own design was used to evaluate the work of a nurse. Respondents signed an informed consent to participate in the study. Results. Positive communication was noted by 90% of respondents, indicating the nurses’ professionalism, empathy, and willingness to create favorable conditions for children's treatment. In addition, the respondents reported a high level of nurses’ adaptation to the extreme conditions of martial law, as well as their ability to ensure effective interaction with patients and their families. Data analysis regarding nurses’ ability to create a friendly atmosphere for children during hospital interactions showed consistently positive feedback from parents. The individual needs of children were rated positively in 85% of responses. However, 5% of respondents answered negatively, indicating that some parents believed their child's needs and interests were not adequately considered by the nurses. Conclusions. The need to work under crisis conditions may affect the effectiveness of nurses' performance. The development of specialized psychological support programs can assist nurses in adapting to the changing realities of wartime, foster their emotional resilience, contribute to the creation of an emotionally safe environment for patients, and support parents during the challenging period of their children’s treatment. Keywords: nursing, adaptation, patient care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".