Bibliographic record
Abstract
132 Euura taegeri (Lacourt, 1996) Figs 106, 340 Polynematus taegeri Lacourt, 1996b: 13–14. Holotype ♀ (MNHN), not examined. Type locality: France, Provence-Alpes-Cote-d’Azur, Ailefroide. Diagnosis Its small subapical claw tooth and the type of lancet (annuli with short and stout setae, all annuli bearing serrulae with denticles) suggest that the species may be most closely related to E. infirma. Ventrally strongly concave lancet, only basal-most annulus without setae, and more annuli (14–15) definitely suggest that E. taegeri is a species distinct from E. infirma (ventrally straight or slightly concave lancet, three basal annuli without setae, 12 annuli). The males are most similar to E. annulata in colouration and shape of penis valves. In E. taegeri, the valvispina may be somewhat broader than in E. annulata and pseudoceps may be dorsoapically slightly convex (slightly concave in E. annulata). Female 4.5–5.0 mm. Male 4.0– 4.5 mm. Type material examined Paratypes Polynematus taegeri FRANCE – Provence-Alpes-Cote-d’Azur • 1♀; Ailefroide; 44.89° N, 6.45° E; 25 May 1990; J. Lacourt leg.; SDEI, DEI-GISHym12670 • 2 ♂♂; same data as for preceeding; SDEI, DEI-GISHym12668, DEIGISHym12669. Host plants Unknown. Genetics COI No data. Nuclear No data. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from France.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".