Metriocnemus (Metriocnemus) fuscipes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metriocnemus (Metriocnemus) fuscipes (Meigen) Figs 24A–F Diagnosis. Body segments with dark purple bands, (Fig. 24A) Labrum (in part, Fig. 24B) SI seta simple, peg-like; labral lamella reduced to conical plate; antenna (in part, Fig. 24B) strongly reduced, 4-segmented, 1 st segment 1.5x wider than long, flagellum with 3 minute segments, AR 1.0, blade longer than flagellum; mandible (Fig. 24C) with 4 inner teeth; mentum (Fig. 24D) with tiny pair of median teeth deeply recessed between the inwardly pointed 1 st laterals, base with small lobe and long posterior sclerotized extension; VM plate indistinct, appearing raised high above lateral teeth; anterior parapods fused with two groups of apical claws and surrounded by numerous rows of spinulae (Fig. 24E); posterior end of abdomen as in Fig. 24F; procercus with relatively short apical setae, about 2.5x as long as procercus; anal tubules cylindrical, about as long as posterior parapods. Notes. The mentum is strongly arched dorsoventrally, and the VM plates raised high making it appear to be inline with the 2 nd laterals. Ecology and habitat. A circumpolar species, larvae live in damp soil adjacent to springs, spring runs, small streams and also within streams (Oliver & Dillon 1997). Sampling sites. Arrowhead and Algonquin Provincial Parks. Nearctic distribution. First published record for Canada: Ontario. USA: Georgia, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".